Back to the program

Beyond a “familiar dysmenorrhea”: Acute appendicitis identified in primary care – A case-based reflection

Ilksen Yazgulu SENOL, Onur BALCI, Zeynep PEKEL and Vildan MEVSIM

Dysmenorrhea is a common reason for consultation in primary care among women of reproductive age. This case highlights the importance of combining history-taking and physical examination to detect an underlying surgical pathology in pain perceived as “habitual” by the patient.A 25-year-old woman presented to a family medicine clinic with a complaint of dysmenorrhea. She reported regular menstrual cycles, typically associated with pain during the first two days. In the current cycle, menstruation had started on the expected date, and the patient was on the second day of bleeding at the time of presentation. She stated that she usually experienced relief with NSAID analgesics; however, she had taken her last available dose the previous evening and attended the clinic to request a prescription. It was clarified that she was virginal and that there was no suspicion of pregnancy. The patient described the current pain as similar in character to the pain experienced during previous menstrual periods. Physical examination revealed tenderness in the right lower quadrant and suprapubic area, with rebound tenderness and mild guarding of unclear voluntary origin.  Based on these findings, the patient was referred to the emergency department with a preliminary diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Follow-up revealed that the patient underwent surgery with a confirmed diagnosis of acute appendicitis and benefited from timely diagnosis and treatment due to early referral.This case highlights that patients may, without malicious intent, present their symptoms within a familiar framework to facilitate fulfillment of their perceived needs, which can mislead clinical evaluation. It also demonstrates how physical examination findings can fundamentally alter clinical decision-making.Patient narratives and clinical findings must always be assessed together and critically. Exclusive reliance on a “familiar pain” description could have resulted in a missed diagnosis of acute appendicitis.This case emphasizes the risk of prematurely concluding diagnostic assessment in primary care when patients associate their symptoms with previously experienced benign conditions.Physical examination is an indispensable component of the art of medicine. Holistic clinical assessment is essential for timely identification of serious conditions.